U.S. Highlights

The U.S. added fewer jobs than expected in August, even as wage growth accelerated, and the unemployment rate edged down. Additionally, JOLTS data pointed to lower job openings, suggesting that the U.S. labor market continued to cool.

Fed Governor Williams stated that the time had come for less restrictive monetary policy but remained mum on the possible size of any cut. Governor Waller, however, suggested he favored starting carefully.

Manufacturing activity continued to contract in August, with demand easing. However, the services sector, continued to chug along as it has for much of this year.

Canadian Highlights

There were no surprises from the Bank of Canada last week, as they proceeded with another rate cut last week. We expect two more rate cuts before the end of the year.

Employment data for August showed modest job gains, but the details of the report indicate cooling in the labour market.

Canada recorded a trade surplus in July, leaving net trade tracking to add modestly to third quarter growth in Canada.

U.S. – With Employment Slowing, The Time to Cut is Here

In a holiday shortened week, the labor market took center stage. Both the Job Opening and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) and employment report were on the calendar. Given the Fed’s recent heighten focus on the second leg of its dual mandate – to promote maximum employment – the reports carried larger than usual significance. Notably, they provided a last look at top-tier labor market data before the Fed’s meeting on September 18th. Markets were generally down throughout the week. The employment report extended that trend as 10-year bond yields edged lower relative to last week’s close (-0.22 percentage points) and the S&P500 also dipped lower (-3.4%), as of the time of writing.

The increase in August’s payroll growth came in lower than anticipated and on a three-month basis, continued to head lower (Chart 1). Additionally, the figures for the prior two months were revised down. Despite this, there was some good news – the unemployment rate ticked down and annual growth in average hourly earnings edged up. last Friday’s payrolls report was a mixed bag, but overall, adds to the thesis that the labour market has eased off the gas. In a statement by Fed Governor Williams, following release of the report, he was clear in his believe that it was now appropriate to dial back policy restrictiveness. Further, speaking after the jobs data, Governor Waller pointed to starting rate cuts “carefully”, but was open to moving faster if the data warrant it.

In another sign of a cooling labor market, the more backward-looking JOLTS report revealed that job openings fell more than anticipated in July to 7.7 million. This marked the lowest level in more than three years. Additionally, the job openings to unemployed workers ratio declined to 1.1 from a high of 2 in early-2022. The job separation rate also ticked up in July after a dip in June, though it still remains relatively low. Overall, the JOLTS data suggests that the pandemic era of tightness in the labor market has receded and adds to the mounting evidence of cooling labor demand and a slowing economy.

On the production side, while the ISM Manufacturing Index managed to edge up in August, it remained in contraction territory for the fifth consecutive month and came in lower than analysts’ expectations. The sector continued to experience weakness in demand as both the new orders and new export orders indexes slid deeper into contraction. The ongoing weakness in the sector rekindled some concerns over the health of the economy. On the services side, however, things were a bit better, with the ISM Services Index coming in at 51.5 in August, up just slightly from 51.4 in July. Overall, the services sector continues to hold its ground, offsetting much of the weakness evident in the manufacturing sector (Chart 2).

With the employment numbers now a known variable, the Fed’s attention will be focused on the inflation data on tap for release this week. Barring any unforeseen flare-ups, all roads seem to lead to a quarter-point rate cut at the September meeting.

Canada – Signs Point to Continued Rate Cuts

The Bank of Canada’s interest rate decision on last Wednesday was front and centre to start off September. As widely expected, the Bank of Canada reduced its benchmark rate by a quarter of a percent, in line with our expectation. Their statement recognized what we have been seeing in the data since their July rate reduction – economic activity has been softening, the labour market has been cooling, and inflation is slowing further towards its target. While the Bank of Canada has maintained a measured tone around inflation, we expect the weakening trends in the labour market and growth to be their focus in upcoming meetings. We continue to expect another 175 basis points in cuts through the end of next year, at a pace of a quarter point per meeting.

July’s trade data on last Wednesday also showed some hints of softening that underscore the need for the Bank of Canada to continue on its rate reduction path. While Canada recorded a trade surplus for the month, this was on the back of declines in both import and export volumes, meaning that the surplus was driven by a combination of higher prices and greater weakness in imports than exports. Weakness in imports is often just another symptom of softening demand in the economy. There may be some brighter notes in the coming months’ trade data. While crude oil exports increased in July due to higher prices and a modest decline in volumes, we expect that volumes should be boosted in the coming months due to shipments from the newly operational Trans Mountain Pipeline (Chart 1). This is a spot to look for growth in next month’s report.

On last Wednesday, the Bank of Canda noted that the labour market had continued to slow, with little change in employment in recent months. At the time, the data for June and July showed close to no monthly changes in total employment. The August data, released last Friday, does complicate that story somewhat, showing a gain of 22k new positions – though this is not a statistically significant increase given the high volatility of this report. Also of note, all of the net new gains in employment in August were in part-time employment (Chart 2). More than that, the increases in full-time employment from the July data were reversed. Notwithstanding the relatively high volatility of the employment data, these are signs of a cooling labour market. Adding to this, labour force growth outpaced employment growth, leading to the unemployment rate to tick up to 6.6 percent. Wage growth moderated somewhat, though still rising at a healthy clip – average hourly wages in August were still up 5% from a year prior, compared to the long-run average of around 3%. Wage growth this high does mean that concerns about inflation are still relevant.

The combination of moderating wage growth, rising unemployment, and falling full-time employment is a clear signal that the labour market is cooling. When expectations for interest rates are as firmly entrenched as they are now, the main thing to look for is any signal that might upset those expectations – and we saw nothing to upset the apple cart last week. Last week’s data were not game changers, leaving a clear case for the Bank of Canada to continue reducing interest rates.

Overview of VinFast Auto Ltd (VFS)

VFS Stock Performance

Key Drivers Behind VinFast’s Stock Movement

Challenges Facing VinFast and VFS Stock

Future Outlook for VinFast and VFS Stock

Conclusion: Is VFS Stock a Buy?

GME Stock’s Roller Coaster History

GameStop’s Business Pivot

Financial Performance: Q2 2024 Overview

Investor Sentiment and Market Reaction

FintechZoom Key Analyst Recommendations:

Challenges and Opportunities Ahead

FastBull’s Take on GME Stock

Conclusion

Key Drivers Behind Today’s USD/INR Movement

Indian Economic Conditions

Crude Oil Prices

Foreign Portfolio Investments (FPIs)

Global Risk Sentiment

Technical Analysis of USD/INR Today

Resistance Levels

Support Levels

Future Outlook: What’s Next for USD/INR?

Upcoming U.S. Economic Data:

RBI Policy Stance:

Crude Oil Prices:

Foreign Portfolio Investments:

Global Market Sentiment:

Conclusion: Navigating the USD/INR Landscape

Political scientists are having a tough time factoring in the “crypto vote” when it comes to the impending United States presidential election. While their opinions run the gamut from claims crypto voters will be the deciding factor in the 2024 race to those who think they’re inconsequential, they all seem to agree on one thing: The number of voters who care about crypto is growing. 

A recent article published by the Northeastern University press took on the challenge of determining just how much impact the so-called “crypto bloc” may have on the 2024 US presidential election. 

According to the political science professors interviewed, polling data suggests a decided political bent between those who hold crypto and those who don’t, but it remains unclear just how many voters consider cryptocurrency a major political issue.

The politics of crypto

A recent scientific poll conducted by Fairleigh Dickinson University indicates that those who own crypto favor former US president and current Republican candidate Donald Trump by a margin of 12 points over his Democratic opponent, Vice President Kamala Harris. 

Source: Fairleigh Dickinson University

The question remaining is one of how much impact those voters will have. All things being equal, could the crypto bloc sway the election? 

As Cointelegraph recently reported, not only has Trump intensified his outreach efforts toward the crypto community but momentum from the Harris campaign has even prompted some executives in the industry to demonstrate support for the Democratic candidate. 

According to Northeastern University professor Ravi Sarathy, the issue is a bit more complex. “Both Republicans and Democrats own crypto,” said Sarathy. He added that “the amount of people who are now aware of and investing in Bitcoin has grown compared to before these ETFs were approved.” 

In Sarathy’s view, the “constituency for bitcoin has grown in size,” indicating that it could end up being a larger factor than some are predicting. 

Nick Beauchamp, associate professor of political science at Northeastern University, had a slightly less positive view concerning the crypto voters’ potential impact. “The crypto ‘voting block’ is not voters but donors,” he said. 

Per Beauchamp, “Crypto appears on almost no one’s list of important issues, and most people are either unaware of it, or have rudimentary opinions.” According to his commentary, the issue is more about the number of donors involved than how many voters they represent:

“However, there are a number of crypto-associated donors who care very much, and these people are the only reason that the campaigns are making crypto statements, and probably the only reason many Republicans and some Democrats like Chuck Schumer are resisting regulation.”

Source: COINTELEGRAPH