Biden’s Sweeping Ai Order Scrapped by Trump in Regulatory Reset

Economic

Summary:

US President Donald Trump rescinded the Biden administration’s sweeping executive order regulating artificial intelligence (AI), marking a significant shift in federal oversight of the rapidly advancing technology.

The move, announced on Monday, immediately halts the implementation of key safety and transparency requirements for AI developers. Biden’s mandate, which was signed in 2023, had required leading AI companies to share safety test results and other critical information for powerful AI systems with the federal government. It also prompted the creation of the US AI Safety Institute, housed under the Commerce Department, to create voluntary guidelines and best practices for the technology’s use.

Trump didn’t immediately say exactly what would replace the order, but the administration is likely to take a more hands-off approach. Before returning to the White House, Trump had criticised Biden’s AI regulations as heavy-handed and hindering tech innovation. Trump also appointed David Sacks, a venture capitalist and longtime critic of tech regulation, as his crypto-AI czar.

With the repeal, Trump has thrown the future of US AI policy into question at a time when other countries are jockeying to set rules of the road for the disruptive technology. Last year, the European Union passed the AI Act, perhaps the most comprehensive guardrails for AI to date. The rules ban facial recognition and require strict oversight for “high-risk” AI used in sectors like healthcare and law enforcement, among other efforts.

The Trump administration is likely to carry on some elements of Biden’s policy, such as promoting US competitiveness on AI against China. Trump has framed the global race for AI leadership as a national security priority. He has also promised to boost domestic energy production to meet AI demands and secure foreign investments in the technology and related infrastructure projects.

During his first term, Trump issued two executive orders on AI that established a set of principles for safe and trustworthy government use of the technology and boosted funding for research and development.

Apart from Biden’s executive order, Washington has struggled to advance federal legislation on AI, spurring some states to develop their own frameworks.

In California, where many top AI companies are based, legislators have passed several bills related to generative AI, including a crackdown on AI deepfakes and more disclosures to bolster transparency for training data. Another controversial bill in the state that would’ve imposed a suite of safety requirements for AI companies was ultimately vetoed after fierce industry opposition.

Colorado and Illinois, meanwhile, have passed laws aimed at protecting people from algorithmic discrimination in hiring. New York will also require businesses to report AI-related job losses under a new order from the governor.

Source: Theedgemarkets

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.

Add to Favorites

Michelle

Economic

Forex

USD/CHF holds ground after experiencing volatility, trading around 0.9070 during the Asian session on Tuesday. The US Dollar saw volatility as US President Donald Trump's inauguration day made waves. However, the USD faced downward pressure as Trump appeared to strengthen his relationship with Chinese President Xi Jinping, with the TikTok deal and a potentially softer approach to tariffs contributing to the shift.

The US Dollar (USD) regained ground following news that President Donald Trump intends to direct federal agencies to review tariff policies and evaluate the United States' trade relationships with Canada, Mexico, and China.

The US Dollar Index (DXY), which tracks the performance of the US Dollar against six major currencies, trades around 108.30 after trimming recent gains. The US Dollar receives downward pressure as the US Treasury yields on 2-year and 10-year bonds remain subdued at 4.23% and 4.54%, respectively, at the time of writing.

According to the CME FedWatch tool, traders anticipate that the US Federal Reserve (Fed) will maintain borrowing rates within the current range of 4.25%-4.50% over the next three policy meetings. However, investors speculate that policies under Trump’s administration could trigger inflationary pressures, potentially limiting the Fed to only one additional rate cut.

The Swiss Franc (CHF) remains broadly weak as investors anticipate that the Swiss National Bank (SNB) could continue to reduce interest rates. Swiss interest rates have already been lowered to 0.5% due to concerns over inflation remaining below the central bank’s target.

The traditionally safe-haven Swiss Franc (CHF) may face challenges as geopolitical tensions in the Middle East ease. Traders are closely watching developments related to a long-delayed ceasefire agreement and a hostage release deal between Israel and Hamas.

Source: FXSTREET

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Owen Li

Economic

Forex

EUR/JPY loses traction to around 161.10 in Tuesday’s early European session, losing 0.62% on the day.

The BoJ is anticipated to raise rates to the highest in 17 years.

The ECB's dovish bets weigh on the shared currency.

The EUR/JPY cross falls to near 161.10 during the early European session on Tuesday. The Japanese Yen strengthens against the US Dollar (USD) due to the rising speculation that the Bank of Japan (BoJ) will raise interest rates at its policy meeting on Friday.

Later on Tuesday, Germany’s ZEW Survey for January will be released.The BoJ is anticipated to hike interest rates in the upcoming monetary policy meeting, with the markets pricing in nearly a 92% odds of a move by the conclusion of the January 23-24 policy meeting. This would lift short-term borrowing costs to levels unseen since the 2008 global financial crisis.

On Tuesday, Japan’s Vice Finance Minister for International Affairs and top foreign exchange official, Atsushi Mimura, said, “The US economy outlook’s up to Trump’s macroeconomic policies.” Meanwhile, Japan’s Finance minister, Katsunobu Kato, stated that the officials will closely watch the impact of US policies on Japan and the world economy, adding that he expects the Japanese central bank to conduct monetary policies appropriately to achieve the 2% inflation goal.On the other hand, the dovish expectations for the European Central Bank (ECB) could drag the Euro (EUR) lower against the JPY.

According to the ECB Monetary Policy Meeting Accounts released on Thursday, policymakers agreed in the December meeting that interest rate cuts should be approached cautiously and gradually, but they also noted that further rate cuts were likely coming given weakening price pressures. Traders expect the ECB will deliver a 25 basis point (bps) rate cut at each of the next four ECB policy meetings, driven by concerns over the Eurozone’s economic outlook and the belief that inflationary pressures will remain subdued.

Bank of Japan FAQs

What is the Bank of Japan?

The Bank of Japan (BoJ) is the Japanese central bank, which sets monetary policy in the country. Its mandate is to issue banknotes and carry out currency and monetary control to ensure price stability, which means an inflation target of around 2%.

What has been the Bank of Japan’s policy?

The Bank of Japan embarked in an ultra-loose monetary policy in 2013 in order to stimulate the economy and fuel inflation amid a low-inflationary environment. The bank’s policy is based on Quantitative and Qualitative Easing (QQE), or printing notes to buy assets such as government or corporate bonds to provide liquidity. In 2016, the bank doubled down on its strategy and further loosened policy by first introducing negative interest rates and then directly controlling the yield of its 10-year government bonds. In March 2024, the BoJ lifted interest rates, effectively retreating from the ultra-loose monetary policy stance.

How do Bank of Japan’s decisions influence the Japanese Yen?

The Bank’s massive stimulus caused the Yen to depreciate against its main currency peers. This process exacerbated in 2022 and 2023 due to an increasing policy divergence between the Bank of Japan and other main central banks, which opted to increase interest rates sharply to fight decades-high levels of inflation. The BoJ’s policy led to a widening differential with other currencies, dragging down the value of the Yen. This trend partly reversed in 2024, when the BoJ decided to abandon its ultra-loose policy stance.

Why did the Bank of Japan decide to start unwinding its ultra-loose policy?

A weaker Yen and the spike in global energy prices led to an increase in Japanese inflation, which exceeded the BoJ’s 2% target. The prospect of rising salaries in the country – a key element fuelling inflation – also contributed to the move.

Source: FXSTREET

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Owen Li

Commodity

There’s a secrecy to the specifics of our planned rendezvous, when I meet a sharp-suited Egon von Greyerz in Zurich airport’s arrivals hall. Hands shaken, he guides us out of a side entrance towards a car park in a quiet corner of the sprawling complex. Roughly 30,000 people work in and around the site; annually, tens of millions of passengers pass through here. Scarce few are aware of the existence, let alone the precise location, of our intended destination: a high-security, 350sqm vault somewhere deep beneath us. Inside it, vast quantities of gold, much of it belonging to von Greyerz, and a roster of his company’s exceedingly wealthy international clientele.

For more than 25 years, von Greyerz has been in this business: buying, selling and storing precious metals for the super-rich, all the while preaching his golden gospel. “We set certain minimum levels,” he says, “to invest through us: $400,000 to store gold in this Zurich vault, or our similar one in Singapore. We use another deep in the Swiss Alps: you’ll need to invest $5m to have anything there.”

It’s not just the uber-wealthy who are turning to gold, as its price continues to soar. Whether going big on bullion or nabbing a gold sovereign for a few hundred pounds to pension-plan, more and more of us are at it. Welcome to a new gold rush. Last year, the Royal Mint, which buys and sells gold bars and coins, had a “record year” for customer purchases. Revenues from its gold bullion sales were up 153% year on year. It’s not hard to see why. In 2024, gold prices increased by 28%. From the climate crisis to Trump’s presidency, and increasing geopolitical instability, the world feels ever more uncertain. As we’ve done for millennia, many are turning to gold in search of safety and security.

For a tiny percentage of investors, this vault in Zurich offers gold-plated security and safety. We are buzzed into an unassuming office building – beyond the ground floor lobby, a cargo warehouse for customs checks. Up on the second floor, most doors are adorned with airline emblems, or those of international logistics firms. There’s little remarkable about the small, open-plan space I’m shown into, save for a large television screen in one corner displaying a series of neatly divided squares, each livestreaming one of the countless CCTV cameras in and around the vault below.

Once seated in the office’s neat meeting room, we get to it. Many vaults globally, von Greyerz begins, are in airports: high security, easy export. Geographically, Switzerland is convenient for storage: 50–70% of global gold is refined here. My passport is taken by a smartly dressed staffer for a final identity check. No photos allowed; I’m asked not to share certain security details. “Our business model is streamlined and simple,” von Greyerz says. “We buy gold for our clients direct from refineries, always freshly minted. We handle all the practicalities of storing it safely. It’s the same process in reverse if you want to sell. Gold has a global market value, known as its paper or spot price. The cost of physical gold is always a little higher, taking into account production costs. We add a small mark-up, too.” The vaults used aren’t owned by von Greyerz. “Given we buy and sell, an independent company storing is necessary: our clients, should they wish to, can come and inspect their assets entirely of their own accord.”

Once given the green light, we descend, beeped into the restricted customs area with its gun-wielding guards. Codes are entered; passes presented. Down a sterile staircase, along a dim, strip-lit tunnel and through a metal detector. Any issues, the alarm system immediately alerts nearby armed airport police. “We actively don’t have armed guards in the vault,” says von Greyerz, “because they can be a liability and turn on you. Few staff, who you know, are better than an army of people. Americans always expect men with machine guns to be stationed outside. That’s not our way.”

I ask the value of what’s stored ahead of us. It’s confidential. Are we talking millions? Tens of millions? Hundreds of millions? Von Greyerz smiles, but his lips won’t loosen. “All I can say is it’s more than whatever you think.” For context, a standard 12.5kg gold bar, the ones you’ll recognise from films, would set you back about £880,000.

Doors slam shut. I’m directed to remain behind a red line, as a heavy hatch is opened. Beyond a lattice of grills, a 130sqm cavern. Sandwiched between wooden crates are layers of large, exposed bars of silver. That’s standard in storage. The walls beyond are lined with shelves, upon which are piles of sealed grey-and-blue boxes: inside them, the gold. In an adjoining room, various treasures are brought out for our examination. First, britannias: 1oz gold coins stamped with a profile of King Charles. “In 2002,” says von Greyerz, “when we first invested in gold, these were worth £200. Now, it’s £1,850.” That was in June 2024, during my vault visit; as of early January 2025, a Britannia is worth over £2,200. Next, a box filled with 100g bars. Rectangular, with round edges. Finally, a pile of 1kg bars, circa £70,000 a piece.

Later, over lunch in Zurich’s old town, von Greyerz sets out his stall. “I’ve always been interested,” he says, “in understanding risk and protecting against downside.” He spent a few years working in the Swiss banking sector before joining a fledgling Dixons in 1972. In London, he was a company man for 17 years, latterly as a board member and finance director. “I resigned at 42, wanting to do my own thing.” He set up shop with a private asset and investment company, advising wealthy families and personal clients.

“Financial risk in the market, then and now, is too high for comfort,” he says. “Global debt today is $315trn; it’s an inescapable bubble. Since the early 1700s, 500 currencies have died, most through hyperinflation. Governments invariably destroy the finances of a country. Empires fall. Global powers change. Today, we’re seeing an acceleration in debts and decline. I think we’re close to another collapse.” He’s written about the subject extensively. A new era, he believes, will be based on commodities, not currency. “So, I turned to wealth preservation and came to the conclusion – obvious, in my opinion – that gold is its ultimate form. Simply put, it’s the only money that has survived through human history. Every other currency, without exception, has failed. In every situation of panic or crisis, people have always looked to gold.”

Convinced, in the late 1990s, von Greyerz took this analysis to a select group of clients. “In 2002, with gold dropping down a little in price, I put everything I had into gold, and suggested those I worked with do the same. It was never meant to become a company selling services or encouraging others to follow. But people kept asking…” Now he has clients in more than 90 countries. “With monetary currency,” he says, “you hold your wealth in something which, with inflation, has a constantly depreciating value. Even with low interest rates, the purchase power of your cash is always going down.”

There’s a distinction, von Greyerz clarifies, between gold and other investments. “I don’t see gold as speculation,” he says, “as something to buy and sell based on market changes. Prices fluctuate, but the trajectory is clear.” In essence, for those he advises – and von Greyerz himself – gold is a hedge; insurance for if and when their other financial assets implode. If the banking system and international order collapses, – say, amid a climate catastrophe – bullion remains tangible when the numbers disappear from our screens. “Our clients are prepared, worried about the world. Entrepreneurs, freethinkers.” Mavericks, maybe. “But they’re not strange people, they’re thinking smartly. Few of our clients invest less than 20% of their wealth in gold. Many invest more, up to 50% even.” Globally, only 0.5% of wealth is stored in gold. “If that goes up to 1.5% even, its value will go up vastly.” Just 3,000 or so tonnes of gold are mined each year; it’s a finite resource, you can’t just, on tap, produce it. Some predict reserves in the ground will run out as soon as 2050. There are other reasons to halt mining before then: emissions and water footprint; and regular reports of the global mining industry’s human rights abuses.

Most of us, von Greyerz concedes, could never dream of purchasing quantities that would qualify for his services. “Still,” he argues, “anything is worth investing. I believe for wealth preservation purposes you should buy gold at any level you can afford. Plus, in the UK, there’s no capital gains tax on any profits made on gold coins that are British legal tender, such as britannias and sovereigns.” In January 1970, 1oz of gold was worth about £14. Today, it’s up more than 15,000%.

Talk of brass tacks alone fails to capture the reality of gold’s enigmatic and enduring allure. Piles of cash, stocks and shares, or say, a lump of copper, would struggle to similarly stir the senses. Other metals are shiny; so why gold? Andrea Ferrero has been a professor of economics at Trinity College, Oxford, for a decade. Previously, he was an economist at the New York Federal Bank. “The starting point of gold’s role,” Ferrero says, “isn’t obvious. Its universal value can be put down to gold having a role in producing luxury goods and other commodities.” Traditionally, gold had few practical applications, its purpose purely cosmetic. “There’s its relative scarcity – we’ve discovered most of the gold, even with active searches. Plus, there are recent commentaries about the role of gold in industry, processors or other chips and technology. Industrial application might be another reason its value is going up.”

We should also look, Ferrero continues, to economic history. For centuries, gold played a major role in both domestic and international monetary systems: the first gold coins were struck on the order of King Croesus of Lydia (today part of Turkey), around 550BC. By the late 19th century, many of the world’s major currencies were fixed to gold at a set price per ounce: the gold standard. “This anchoring allowed for exchange rate stability. Today,” says Ferrero, “we live in the legacy of that system: the main role of gold is still hedging, a safe haven commodity.”

Source:The guardian

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Cohen

Economic

The new normal for any ASEAN Chair is the expectation of having to manage a crisis, if not multiple crises, amid an increasingly hostile geopolitical environment. The Myanmar conflict and South China Sea crisis will have repercussions for ASEAN throughout 2025.

The Myanmar crisis is the most severe test of ASEAN’s internal unity to date. In the absence of a common position, the grouping’s approach to the crisis remains its most divisive issue, with some members keen to bring Myanmar back into the fold as quickly as possible, while others insist on staying true to a ‘Myanmar-owned, Myanmar-led’ process. Given the divergent interests of ASEAN member states and that of key external partners — such as China’s — support for the junta’s election plans, as the 2025 ASEAN Chair, Malaysia would need to carefully balance and engage stakeholders with parity.

The South China Sea is becoming a serious potential flashpoint for ASEAN, with severe repercussions for global security and trade. 2024 was marked by episodes of heightened tensions and provocations between China and the Philippines which are likely to continue in 2025 and possibly worsen.

Malaysia should use its chairmanship to elevate confidence-building measures and preventive diplomacy at the ASEAN–China level to reduce the risk of conflict in the South China Sea. As a claimant state, Malaysia has direct stakes and would be well-placed to start the ball rolling. But given Malaysia’s significant trade relations with China, it remains to be seen how much leverage Malaysia has. Malaysia’s best course of action will be to keep the South China Sea Code of Conduct negotiations channel open.

As 2025 ASEAN Chair, Malaysia faces heightened geopolitical tensions, increased economic fragmentation, rising protectionism, nationalism, revisionism and consequences of the growing China–US rivalry in the region.

Of these issues, the most concerning is the United States’ unpredictable turn towards insularism and increasingly protectionist measures. Trump’s ability to disrupt the liberal international order is alarming for many moderate countries of the Global South that are used to operating in a stable global order that respects international law and promotes free trade.

But Malaysia–US bilateral relations have been tense under Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim largely due to the US position on the Gaza war which runs counter to Malaysia’s support for the Palestinian cause. This is juxtaposed with the excellent relationship that Malaysia currently enjoys with China. With Malaysia as Country Coordinator for ASEAN-China relations until 2027, it is likely that Malaysia may place more emphasis on ASEAN–China relations and less on developing ASEAN–US relations at a time when the incoming Trump administration is showing signs of disinterest.

Malaysia has formally invited China to attend the ASEAN–Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) Summit in May 2025. This proposal took observers by surprise as the first ASEAN–GCC Summit was only in October 2023. It is unclear what China’s role will be at the second ASEAN–GCC Summit, but the rationale behind this proposal could be to build on China’s deep economic linkages with both regions to find greenfield opportunities. This summit will also give Anwar an opportunity to showcase Malaysia’s leadership in South–South cooperation, as evident in Malaysia’s stated ambitions to join BRICS.

Malaysia’s best bet is to continue to drive deeper regional economic integration. Notwithstanding Trump’s threats to impose tariffs on friends and foes alike, an economically integrated ASEAN yields many benefits. To ASEAN’s credit, despite the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic and economic shocks in recent years, ASEAN has continued with key upgrades to make ASEAN’s economic instruments fit-for-purpose. These upgrades include the ASEAN–China Free Trade Agreement 3.0, the ASEAN Trade-in-Goods Agreement and the expansion of the ASEAN Single Window with key trading partners.

Under Malaysia’s watch, the region will see the adoption of the ASEAN Community Vision 2045 at the 46th ASEAN Summit in Kuala Lumpur in late 2025. This will set ASEAN’s strategic direction for the next 20 years. There is much at stake for Malaysia as the co-Chair of the High-Level Taskforce on ASEAN Community’s Post-2025 Vision. It is incumbent on Malaysia to ensure that the final ASEAN Community Vision 2045 is able to future-proof ASEAN.

The second major milestone in 2025 is the conclusion of the ASEAN Digital Economy Framework Agreement (DEFA). Negotiations have been fast-tracked and are expected to conclude by the end of the year. The Agreement will be the world’s first regionwide digital agreement that offers a comprehensive roadmap to accelerate digital trade in services, e-commerce, digital payment systems and more. The DEFA is projected to value-add some US$2 trillion to ASEAN’s economy by 2030 and pave the way for ASEAN to facilitate a greater volume of digital trade with its dialogue partners.

But ASEAN may run the risk of deepening the digital divide in the region. As part of the ASEAN digital community discussions, Malaysia can bridge this divide with a focus on enhancing digital education and access across the region.

Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim has already set the stage for Malaysia’s ASEAN Chairmanship by announcing the appointment of informal personal advisers. These advisers include former Thai prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra, former Indonesian foreign minister Retno Marsudi and former Singaporean foreign minister George Yeo. There remains much scepticism about Anwar’s ‘ASEAN study group’, with some observers seeing this advisory team as performative on Anwar’s part.

For the last 50 years, ASEAN has been a beneficiary of a free, stable global environment. But with the changes Trump’s presidency will usher in, the biggest challenge for Malaysia, as Chair of ASEAN, will be figuring out how to navigate these changes and find opportunities for ASEAN to continue to thrive in unfamiliar territory.

Source：EASTASIAFORUM

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Owen Li

Economic

Europe is seeing a dramatic boost in defense budgets, driven by both long-standing pressure from Washington and the continent’s own reaction to Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine. That promises a glut of military contracts for weapons-makers in Europe as well as in the U.S., South Korea and elsewhere.

That also explains why the industry is relatively relaxed about Trump.

If he pulls the U.S. out of NATO and leaves Europe to go it alone, the continent will have to rely on its own arms companies, netting them a surge of contracts.

But even if the new president doesn’t do anything so radical, the enormous scale of new defense spending — the European Commission estimates that the bloc’s members will need to spend €500 billion on defense over the next decade — still means there will be a lot of money available for European defense firms.

That said, the early winner of Europe’s defense buildup is likely to be the U.S.

“The European defense industry cannot cover it all, particularly after decades of underinvestment that have seriously undermined Europe’s defense industrial capacities,” said Jan Pie, secretary-general of Brussels-based defense industry lobby ASD. "This trend must be reversed. Buying non-European ultimately means that European industry will continue struggle to get a return on its investments will over time lose its technological know-how and related skills."

Roughly 55 percent of Europe’s arms imports from 2019 to 2023 were from America, sharply up on 35 percent over the preceding five years, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI). Why Trump Means Good Times For Europe’s Arms-Makers_1

Why Trump Means Good Times For Europe’s Arms-Makers_1

“In terms of deliveries, the actual volume of weapons transferred from the U.S. to European states is ... planned to increase significantly in the coming years,” said Pieter Wezeman, a senior researcher at SIPRI, adding that those deals had “nothing to do with Trump” but rather with the scramble for gear following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

That trend could shift even more in America’s favor if countries attempt to curry favor with Trump by placing more contracts with U.S. companies.

“We don’t know much of Trump’s intentions, but I wouldn’t be surprised if countries, especially in the east, will buy more and more American stuff,” a European diplomat said.

Doubts remain, however — mostly regarding how Trump will act.

“Deterrence is a mind game, it’s not a weapons game,” said Christian Mölling, who tracks defense procurement for the Bertelsmann Foundation. “I’m questioning the underlining assumption that you can buy yourself American leadership through weapons deals.”

For now, American companies are doing well, selling Lockheed Martin F-35A Lightning II fighters, AH-64 Apache helicopters, Patriot air defense system, Abrams tanks and more to countries across the continent.

But EU nations that are modernizing their militaries, such as Poland and Romania, also procure from European arms-makers, and that’s unlikely to end soon, no matter what Trump does.

Poland last year spent €1.5 billion on thousands of Carl Gustaf M4 recoilless rifles and hundreds of thousands of rounds of ammunition from Sweden, while in 2023 it bought Saab 340 early warning and control aircraft.

Warsaw is also mulling buying Eurofighter Typhoons, manufactured by a consortium of Airbus, BAE Systems and Leonardo, within its continued air force modernization.

Romania is buying Mistral 3 air defense missiles from France.

Other European countries show similar patterns. Some 15 European countries are on track to buy F-35As, but the Eurofighter Typhoon is looking at new sales to Germany, Italy and Spain. Saab is also continuing to push its JAS 39 Gripen fighter, last year selling four to Hungary.

The early signal from Trump is that he wants defense spending to rise steeply.

Of NATO’s 32 members, 24 now meet the alliance target of spending at least 2 percent of GDP on defense, and Trump is pushing for that to rise to 5 percent — a figure that only Poland comes close to meeting at the moment, with Lithuania having pledged to hit it in the future.

Even if NATO falls short of that target, it’s clear that defense budgets, and defense contracts, will continue to go up.

“The pressure Trump is creating at the moment is good for Europe,” Rheinmetall’s CEO Armin Papperger told Bloomberg this month.

Although European companies will do well, there are limits on how much of that increased spending they’ll be able to absorb.

Defense officials insist Europe needs America’s defense industry more than ever, a recognition that the U.S. military-industrial complex supplies a lot of kit that Europe can’t match thanks to the scale of its arms firms. Why Trump Means Good Times For Europe’s Arms-Makers_2

Why Trump Means Good Times For Europe’s Arms-Makers_2

Speaking to the European Parliament earlier this month, NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte banged the drum for faster imports of American arms.

“This was my argument with Trump, open up the U.S. defense market,” Rutte told lawmakers of his discussions with the incoming president. “Because if you want to buy something in the in the U.S., you have to go through Congress, the White House, the Defense Department, Pentagon, etc., before you can get your hands on the Patriot system.”

But European capitals also want to ensure that some of that extra cash goes to domestic companies.

To bolster European production, in his report last year on the state of the EU’s economic competitiveness, former Italian PM Mario Draghi called on EU members to aggregate demand and to raise the share of joint defense procurement.

“As EU defence spending rises, defence industrial consolidation, integration and technological innovation should be supported by reinforced European preference principles in procurement, ensuring that a minimum share of this rising demand is concentrated on European companies rather than flowing overseas,” Draghi wrote.

That’s an idea backed by Swedish PM Ulf Kristersson.

“The more we build a common Europe with common procurement with common standards, the easier it will be to achieve large scale,” he told POLITICO.

Despite the scale of some U.S. companies, Europe still has heavyweights. From two rival programs to develop sixth-generation fighter planes, to a Franco-German project to research a new tank, a program to develop new naval corvettes, the Franco-Italian SAMP/T air defense system, and billions pouring into drone development, European companies expect to continue scoring big contracts as the continent rearms.

“There’s so much money going around,” Rutte said in the European Parliament. “Be good businessmen ... Don’t lose out to the South Koreans.”

Source:politico europe

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Glendon

Commodity

BENGALURU (Jan 21): Gold prices rose for a second session on Tuesday as the dollar weakened, with markets evaluating the possible consequences of US President Donald Trump's policies in his second term after his inauguration.

Spot gold had gained 0.6% to US$2,724.74 (RM12,200.02) per ounce by 0240 GMT. US gold futures were 0.2% lower at US$2,742.50.

The dollar was down about 1% after reports suggested any new taxes would be imposed in a "measured" way. A weaker dollar makes gold more attractive to foreign buyers.

"There is a sense of relief in risk sentiment to know that tariffs have not been an immediate focus. The unwinding of bets on imminent trade tensions is most evident in the US dollar," IG market strategist Yeap Jun Rong said.

"The mixed dynamics do see gold prices holding up for now, and we may expect gold to remain an attractive hedge instrument. The US$2,720 level will be an immediate resistance to watch."

After weeks of global speculation over which duties Trump would impose tariffs on his first day in office, news that Trump would take more time on tariffs drove a relief rally in global stocks and pressured the US dollar.

Trump had proposed tariffs of up to 10% on global imports, 60% on Chinese goods, and a 25% import surcharge on Canadian and Mexican products.

While gold is traditionally viewed as an inflation hedge, Trump's policies are seen as inflationary, which could lead the Federal Reserve to maintain higher interest rates, affecting gold's appeal.

The degree to which the incoming administration implements Trump's policy pledges will significantly influence the future direction of US interest rates.

The non-yielding bullion tends to thrive in a low-interest rate environment.

Spot silver added 0.4% to US$30.61 per ounce. Palladium dropped 1.2% to US$933.25, and platinum shed 0.1% to US$941.30.

Source: Theedgemarkets

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Daily News

Remarks of Officials

Central Bank

Forex

FastBull Events

FastBull Featured

Devin

Mohammad Omar

Recent Searches

Top Searches

Markets

News

Analysis

User

24/7

Economic Calendar

Education

Data

Biden’s Sweeping Ai Order Scrapped by Trump in Regulatory Reset

Source: Theedgemarkets

USD/CHF Remains Steady Above 0.9050 Amid Market Volatility on Trump's Inauguration

Source: FXSTREET

EUR/JPY Declines to Near 161.00 as BoJ Keeps Door Open for Rate Hike

Bank of Japan FAQs

What is the Bank of Japan?

What has been the Bank of Japan’s policy?

How do Bank of Japan’s decisions influence the Japanese Yen?

Why did the Bank of Japan decide to start unwinding its ultra-loose policy?

Source: FXSTREET

The New Gold Rush: Why The Precious Metal Has Lost None of Its Allure

Source:The guardian

ASEAN should Hope for the Best but Pepare for the Worst in 2025

Source：EASTASIAFORUM

Why Trump Means Good Times For Europe’s Arms-Makers

Source:politico europe

Gold Gains as Dollar Dips; Trump's Tariff Plans in Focus

Source: Theedgemarkets

Risk Disclosure