Markets
News
Analysis
User
24/7
Economic Calendar
Education
Data
- Names
- Latest
- Prev
A:--
F: --
A:--
F: --
P: --
A:--
F: --
P: --
A:--
F: --
P: --
A:--
F: --
P: --
A:--
F: --
P: --
A:--
F: --
P: --
A:--
F: --
P: --
A:--
F: --
P: --
A:--
F: --
P: --
A:--
F: --
P: --
A:--
F: --
P: --
A:--
F: --
P: --
A:--
F: --
P: --
A:--
F: --
P: --
A:--
F: --
A:--
F: --
P: --
A:--
F: --
P: --
A:--
F: --
P: --
A:--
F: --
P: --
A:--
F: --
P: --
A:--
F: --
A:--
F: --
P: --
A:--
F: --
P: --
A:--
F: --
A:--
F: --
P: --
A:--
F: --
P: --
A:--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
--
F: --
P: --
No matching data
Latest Views
Latest Views
Trending Topics
To quickly learn market dynamics and follow market focuses in 15 min.
In the world of mankind, there will not be a statement without any position, nor a remark without any purpose.
Inflation, exchange rates, and the economy shape the policy decisions of central banks; the attitudes and words of central bank officials also influence the actions of market traders.
Money makes the world go round and currency is a permanent commodity. The forex market is full of surprises and expectations.
Top Columnists
Enjoy exciting activities, right here at FastBull.
The latest breaking news and the global financial events.
I have 5 years of experience in financial analysis, especially in aspects of macro developments and medium and long-term trend judgment. My focus is maily on the developments of the Middle East, emerging markets, coal, wheat and other agricultural products.
BeingTrader chief Trading Coach & Speaker, 8+ years of experience in the forex market trading mainly XAUUSD, EUR/USD, GBP/USD, USD/JPY, and Crude Oil. A confident trader and analyst who aims to explore various opportunities and guide investors in the market. As an analyst I am looking to enhance the trader’s experience by supporting them with sufficient data and signals.
Latest Update
Risk Warning on Trading HK Stocks
Despite Hong Kong's robust legal and regulatory framework, its stock market still faces unique risks and challenges, such as currency fluctuations due to the Hong Kong dollar's peg to the US dollar and the impact of mainland China's policy changes and economic conditions on Hong Kong stocks.
HK Stock Trading Fees and Taxation
Trading costs in the Hong Kong stock market include transaction fees, stamp duty, settlement charges, and currency conversion fees for foreign investors. Additionally, taxes may apply based on local regulations.
HK Non-Essential Consumer Goods Industry
The Hong Kong stock market encompasses non-essential consumption sectors like automotive, education, tourism, catering, and apparel. Of the 643 listed companies, 35% are mainland Chinese, making up 65% of the total market capitalization. Thus, it's heavily influenced by the Chinese economy.
HK Real Estate Industry
In recent years, the real estate and construction sector's share in the Hong Kong stock index has notably decreased. Nevertheless, as of 2022, it retains around 10% market share, covering real estate development, construction engineering, investment, and property management.
Hongkong, China
Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam
Dubai, UAE
Lagos, Nigeria
Cairo, Egypt
White Label
Data API
Web Plug-ins
Affiliate Program
View All
No data
Not Logged In
Log in to access more features
FastBull Membership
Not yet
Purchase
Log In
Sign Up
Hongkong, China
Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam
Dubai, UAE
Lagos, Nigeria
Cairo, Egypt
White Label
Data API
Web Plug-ins
Affiliate Program
Policy woes are made in the US, not abroad.
The BoJ's rate hike itself was already fully priced into the market, so it came as no surprise. But the Bank's latest quarterly outlook report sent a clearer message that further rate hikes would come sooner than the market had expected. The BoJ expects inflation to remain above 2% until FY2026. Governor Kazuo Ueda's communication at the press conference was rather ambiguous about the timing of the next rate hike and the terminal rate, but this was somewhat expected. Governor Ueda reiterated that the real interest rate remains negative, and monetary conditions therefore remain accommodative. Thus the market appears to be more closely following the projection of the sustainable inflation outlook.
The December inflation results are mostly in line with market consensus. Inflation jumped to 3.6% year-on-year in December (vs 2.9% in November, market consensus 3.4%) mainly due to a pick up in utilities (11.4%) and fresh food prices (17.3%). Higher utilities are mainly due to the end of the government subsidy programme. Rice prices continued to rise sharply which will lead to service prices (eating out) rising with a time lag, thus the BoJ should be watching the price trend carefully.
Core inflation excluding fresh food also rose to 3.0% (vs 2.7% in November, 3.0% market consensus) while core-core inflation excluding fresh food and energy stayed at 2.4% (vs 2.4% in November, market consensus). In the monthly comparison, inflation growth accelerated to 0.6% month-on-month seasonally-adjusted (vs 0.4% in November) with goods and services up by 1.1% and 0.1% each. Apart from the end of energy subsidies and rising fresh food prices, service prices are rising steadily, which in our view is more important than the rise in headline inflation.
Governor Ueda's comments made clear that the Bank is not in a hurry to raise rates again. But we noted that his optimistic view on the outlook for spring wage negotiations is a signal that a May hike option is on the table. For the May hike to materialise, Shunto's results would need to be as strong as last year's, which is our base case scenario.
We expect inflation to cool down from January as the government renews its energy subsidy programme, but rising rice prices are likely to have a second-round effect in pushing up broader services prices.
If another solid wage negotiation and steady rise in service prices are confirmed, we expect another 25bp hike in May.
One of the major risk factors is President Trump's trade policy. So far Trump's trade policy has been mostly in line with market consensus and there has been no particular negative news for Japan. But, this may change in the future, and the BoJ's rate hike may be delayed.
As markets perceived the upward revision in inflation forecasts as a hawkish signal, there seems to be a bit more tailwind for the yen. Remember USD/JPY still has room to unwind extensive long positioning and the dollar has continued to lose momentum since Trump’s inauguration as the threat of imminent tariffs is decreasing.
Two-year JPY swap rates have risen by only 3bp to 0.74% after the BoJ announcement, which signals there is more room for a hawkish repricing in the curve in the coming months if we are correct with our expectations for two more hikes in 2025. That bodes well for the yen, which however remains heavily dependent on the impact of Trump policies on US Treasury yields.
Our rates team retains a bearish call UST which makes us reluctant to switch to a downward-sloping profile for USD/JPY just yet. That said, should upside room for US yields end up proving limited, the case for USD/JPY to move to the 155-150 range this year becomes quite compelling given the relatively hawkish BoJ and still significant medium-term overvaluation of the pair.
For years, Silicon Valley has pushed the tech envelope beyond reason, where tech stocks are valued less on fundamentals and more on collective optimism. NVIDIA’s stock correction on Jan 27th, 2025, losing nearly 20%, contributed to an incredible $580 billion loss in its market value just in hours. This isn’t just a correction; it’s the biggest market value drop in U.S. stock market history (Bloomberg).
Investors have been pouring money into AI stocks, believing in limitless potential without questioning fundamentals. NVIDIA’s incredible rise was fueled by the AI boom, but let’s be clear, its correction may not be a fluke; was it inevitable? When a single stock’s market cap rivals entire economies, we’re no longer talking about sound investing. We’re talking about excess speculation fueled by investors optimism.
As of January 28, 2025, NVIDIA’s P/E ratio was roughly 50.67. At its peak, Nvidia value surpassed $3.3 trillion, more than the GDP of the United Kingdom for 2024. But with Monday’s losses, Apple has become again the world’s most valuable company. NVIDIA’s valuation conversely, has gone down to around $2.8 trillion.
This isn’t just about NVIDIA. The entire Silicon Valley model has been riding the hyper valuation race for years, pushing valuations to absurd levels while ignoring the question: Can these tech companies mantain their astronomical growth, or are they just part of the limitless bullishness characterizing the sector?
Consider SoundHound AI, a voice recognition firm that has grown over 700% in recent months, despite generating less than $100 million in annual revenue. Its valuation, at over $5 billion, implies a future where it dominates the AI space, despite competing against giants like Google, Amazon and others.
While Silicon Valley continue riding its valuation excesses, Chinese AI firms like DeepSeek are quietly emerging as the sector leader. Operating under U.S. sanctions, they’re proving that constraints and less resources can lead to more ingenuity. Instead of throwing billions at overhyped GPUs, they’re developing leaner, more cost-effective models that deliver results without breaking the bank.
DeepSeek’s recent announcement of technology as powerful as OpenAI’s but requiring fewer chips played a role in NVIDIA’s market value drop. But the AI race isn’t just about the biggest names. Smaller, more cost-efficient companies from the U.S., China, and beyond are developing smarter, leaner models. As the hype settles, the real breakthroughs may come from those focused on efficiency and practical solutions rather than endless spending. If NVIDIA’s drop is any sign, the next phase of AI could be shaped by those who can do more with less.
For too long, the market has treated Silicon Valley like the privileged investment hub that could never fail. But as NVIDIA’s correction proves, gravity still exists. The AI gold rush has inflated bubbles that may not hold forever. Market stakeholder should take this as a warning and be prepared for future market scares. What I am going to do, is start paying attention to these lean start-ups who are building tech that’s not just exciting, but that actually deliver products that makes long term financial sense and that can deliver public goods.
However, even in this selloff, it’s important to maintain perspective: NVIDIA is the world leader in this space, and will likely remine such for the foreseeable future. Its shares are still up more than 480% over the last two years. This is a sharp correction, but it doesn’t erase the company’s meteoric rise and success.
The Korean economy posted weaker-than-expected growth last year amid slowing export growth, sagging domestic demand and a political crisis.
The economic expansion in the fourth quarter also came far below the earlier forecast by the Bank of Korea (BOK) as political turmoil sparked by President Yoon Suk Yeol's shocking martial law declaration dented private spending and investment, according to the central bank.
The country's real gross domestic product — a key measure of economic growth — increased 2 percent in 2024, according to preliminary data from the BOK.
The 2024 figure was lower than the central bank's forecast of a 2.2 percent expansion, though the growth accelerated from a 1.4 percent advance in 2023.
Last year's growth was led by exports, which surged 6.9 percent from a year earlier, compared with a 3.5 percent on-year increase in 2023.
Private spending rose 1.1 percent in 2024, slower than a 1.8 percent growth the previous year.
Facility investment gained 1.8 percent, while construction investment fell 2.7 percent.
In the fourth quarter alone, Asia's fourth-largest economy advanced 0.1 percent on-quarter, far lower than the BOK's forecast of a 0.4 percent growth.
On a yearly basis, the economy grew 1.2 percent in the fourth quarter, slowing from the previous quarter's 1.5 percent gain.
Exports inched up 0.3 percent from three months earlier in the fourth quarter, while imports shed 0.1 percent.
Private consumption added 0.2 percent on-quarter, and government spending rose 0.5 percent. Facility investment also climbed 1.6 percent.
But construction investment dropped 3.2 percent, the data showed.
"Heightened political uncertainties affected consumer sentiment and private spending. The situation of the construction industry was worse than expected," BOK official Shin Seung-cheol told a press briefing.
Yoon declared a shocking martial law on Dec. 3, and the National Assembly voted to impeach him.
Yoon was arrested earlier this month and has come under investigation on charges of leading an insurrection and committing abuse of power.
Korea had been on an economic recovery track at the beginning of 2024, but momentum has weakened as the growth of exports has slowed and domestic demand remained in the doldrums.
The economy expanded 1.3 percent from three months earlier in the first quarter but contracted 0.2 percent in the second quarter before barely growing 0.1 percent in the third quarter.
The BOK earlier presented a 1.9 percent growth outlook for the Korean economy in 2025, which is widely expected to be lowered further.
"Weak domestic demand and the construction industry slump are expected to continue through the first quarter of this year," Shin said, citing a potential extra budget and policy changes under the new Donald Trump administration as major factors that will affect the economy down the road. (Yonhap)
No surprises from the Federal Reserve at today’s FOMC meeting with a unanimous decision to leave the Fed funds target range at 4.25-4.5%. After 100bp of cuts through the final four months of 2024 the Fed had already signalled a desire to take time to evaluate the impact of their actions and to also gain greater clarity on how President Trump’s policy thrust may impact the economy.
That said, within the accompanying statement there is a hawkish shift in language that suggests we need to see an unambiguous softening in the data for them to deliver further interest rate cuts. It repeats that economic expansion remains “solid”, but they have removed the comment that inflation has “made progress” towards the 2% target, saying merely that “inflation remains somewhat elevated” – although in the press conference Chair Powell downplayed the significance of this. They also state that unemployment has “stabilised” with labour market conditions “solid”. In December they said that labour market conditions had “generally eased”.
The Fed will no doubt be braced for criticism from President Trump who told last week’s Davos World Economic Forum that “with oil prices going down, I'll demand that interest rates drop immediately, and likewise they should be dropping all over the world”. The Fed under Jay Powell, whose term expires next year, will only acquiesce if to do so would be consistent with their mandate. Their December forecasts do indicate an inclination to cut interest rates – they are projecting two cuts this year – but their concern is likely to be that Donald Trump’s policy thrust of tax cuts and less regulation should be growth supportive while tariffs and immigration controls are likely to be somewhat inflationary. With tomorrow’s GDP data expected to show the economy grew 2.8% last year and with unemployment a little above 4% and core inflation lingering around 3% the Fed are likely to pause here for a number of months. This was confirmed by Chair Powell in the press conference when he said "we do not need to be in a hurry to adjust out policy stance".
Our forecast had been three Federal Reserve interest rate cuts in 2025 – March, June and September – but this was heavily dependent on President Trump’s enacted policies as well as the evolution of data. We remain optimistic on a further moderation in annual inflation rates in the months ahead, helped by slowing housing cost increases. We also anticipate that next month’s payrolls benchmark revisions will indicate a much weaker job creation path than initially reported. However, with Donald Trump threatening 25% tariffs on Mexico and Canada and 10% on China from this weekend the narrative could rapidly change – indeed Powell admits "we don't know what will happen with tariffs, with immigration, with fiscal policy, with regulatory policy". But in an environment of renewed Fed wariness we are leaning in the direction of a slower rate cutting path of two 25bp rate cuts in the second half of 2025 with a further 25bp cut in early 2026 while acknowledging that the range of possible outcomes is, if anything, widening.
It’s clear that inflation is still an issue at the Fed. Not as severe as it was, but let’s say, not a fully resolved issue. Treasuries have had the same view over recent months. This is a 3% inflation economy, and therein lies the genesis of the funds rate not getting back down to neutral (3%) and the 10yr Treasury yield remaining above 4.5%. The impulse reaction for Treasuries is negative due to this. We’re not fully convinced this is the beginning of resumed bear market just yet, as we have the PCE inflation report this week. The worry will be that the Fed has seen it, and maybe is not thrilled by it. If so, that’s not great for Treasuries.
On the likely end to QT by mid year (our view), the short FOMC statement chose not to mention it. Maybe not big for them now. But they certainly must have talked about it. The issue here is excess liquidity (which we define as bank reserves plus reverse repo balances). It is likely to hit levels that the Fed would prefer not to go below from the middle of 2025 onwards, partly depending on how the debt ceiling saga evolves. The key number here is US$3tn for bank reserves, representing about 10% of GDP. We are currently at US$3.3tn. However, with QT running at US$60bn per month, ongoing QT would bring reserves down in net terms. The Fed will want to end QT before things get overly tight.
But clearly the Fed did not want to make a big deal on the end of QT, as it will end. Rather the "no change" outcome is smothered by inflation stubbornness, although in the end smoothed over by another ever-calm Chair Powell performance.
A mildly hawkish FOMC statement has seen the dollar take its cue from the USD rates market and edge a little higher. This in no way compares to December’s big shift in Fed communication and projections which helped propel the DXY dollar index to a high of 110 in early January. And in fact, those modest dollar gains have proved fleeting today.
Instead, the FX market will probably take a little more interest in Friday’s release of the December core PCE inflation release and a lot more interest in whether the weekend sees the Trump administration follow-through on threats to impose tariffs on Canada, Mexico and China.
In particular, in its Monetary Policy Report released today, the Bank of Canada has tried to model the impact of a 25% US tariff on all Canadian goods and retaliatory Canadian tariffs by the same amount. The conclusion is that Canadian growth would be 2.5% below baseline forecasts in Year 1, while the inflationary impact would see CPI being a full 1% above baseline forecasts by Year 3.
Importantly, a separate research article in that publication estimates that of the 7% rise in USD/CAD since October, 6% of that rise has been driven by a risk premium. In other words, and we agree, the threat of tariffs has been a major driver of FX rates and that will probably be the case as FX markets await trade developments this weekend. And if not this weekend, uncertainty around findings of a major US trade review in April looks likely to keep the dollar bid over coming months.
In short, tariffs and not rate differentials are the major FX driver now. But a slightly hawkish Fed can only help a market currently positioned overweight the dollar.
White Label
Data API
Web Plug-ins
Poster Maker
Affiliate Program
The risk of loss in trading financial instruments such as stocks, FX, commodities, futures, bonds, ETFs and crypto can be substantial. You may sustain a total loss of the funds that you deposit with your broker. Therefore, you should carefully consider whether such trading is suitable for you in light of your circumstances and financial resources.
No decision to invest should be made without thoroughly conducting due diligence by yourself or consulting with your financial advisors. Our web content might not suit you since we don't know your financial conditions and investment needs. Our financial information might have latency or contain inaccuracy, so you should be fully responsible for any of your trading and investment decisions. The company will not be responsible for your capital loss.
Without getting permission from the website, you are not allowed to copy the website's graphics, texts, or trademarks. Intellectual property rights in the content or data incorporated into this website belong to its providers and exchange merchants.