Exploring Ethereum with FintechZoom: The Driving Force Behind Decentralized Finance

Economic

Summary:

Discover how Ethereum, highlighted by FintechZoom, revolutionizes the crypto landscape with smart contracts and DeFi applications. Learn about its market performance, future potential, and how FastBull can guide your investment journey.

Ethereum has emerged as one of the most prominent players in the cryptocurrency space since its inception in 2015. Unlike Bitcoin, which primarily serves as a digital currency, Ethereum was designed as a platform for decentralized applications (dApps) and smart contracts. This flexibility has enabled Ethereum to facilitate a wide range of financial services and innovative projects, making it a key player in the growing decentralized finance (DeFi) sector.

The Basics of Ethereum

At its core, Ethereum operates on a blockchain that allows developers to build and deploy applications. This blockchain uses Ether (ETH) as its native cryptocurrency, which is utilized for transactions and as a means to pay for computational services. One of the most revolutionary aspects of Ethereum is its support for smart contracts—self-executing contracts with the terms of the agreement directly written into code. This feature removes the need for intermediaries, streamlining processes and reducing costs.

Market Performance and Trends

Ethereum's price has experienced significant volatility, much like the broader cryptocurrency market. In recent years, it has achieved all-time highs, driven by increased adoption of DeFi applications and non-fungible tokens (NFTs). Analysts frequently examine factors such as network upgrades, regulatory developments, and market sentiment to forecast Ethereum's price movements.

In 2023, Ethereum underwent a major upgrade known as the Merge, which transitioned the network from a proof-of-work (PoW) consensus mechanism to a proof-of-stake (PoS) model. This transition is expected to enhance scalability and reduce energy consumption, making Ethereum more environmentally friendly and efficient.

Decentralized Finance (DeFi) and Ethereum

The rise of DeFi has been a game changer for Ethereum. DeFi applications built on the Ethereum network allow users to lend, borrow, and trade without relying on traditional financial institutions. Platforms like Uniswap and Aave have gained massive popularity, further solidifying Ethereum's position as the leading platform for DeFi.

With the growing number of DeFi projects, Ethereum's network has seen increased usage, which can drive up transaction fees—often referred to as "gas fees." As the ecosystem continues to expand, scalability solutions like Layer 2 protocols (e.g., Optimism and Arbitrum) are being developed to help alleviate congestion and reduce costs for users.

Future Outlook

Looking ahead, Ethereum's future appears promising, with several factors poised to drive growth:

Continued Adoption: As more projects launch on Ethereum, the network's utility will continue to expand.

Regulatory Clarity: As governments around the world establish clearer regulations for cryptocurrencies, institutional adoption could increase, providing a significant boost to Ethereum's market.

Technological Advancements: Future upgrades, including Ethereum 2.0 features, will likely enhance scalability and security, attracting more developers and users.

Integration with Traditional Finance: Collaborations between traditional financial institutions and blockchain technology could further entrench Ethereum's role in the financial ecosystem.

Conclusion

Ethereum's versatility and growing ecosystem position it as a cornerstone of the cryptocurrency market. While challenges like gas fees and competition from other platforms exist, the potential for growth remains significant. Investors and developers alike are keenly watching how Ethereum evolves in the rapidly changing crypto landscape.

As part of navigating the complexities of investing in Ethereum and other cryptocurrencies, platforms like FastBull offer valuable insights and trading signals. FastBull provides users with real-time analysis and updates, helping investors make informed decisions in the ever-evolving crypto market.

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.

Add to Favorites

Glendon

Economic

The year 2013 was notable for the financial markets, marked by a wave of initial public offerings (IPOs) that attracted considerable attention from investors and analysts alike. Several high-profile companies made their debut on public exchanges, each with its unique story and impact on the market. In this article, we'll explore some of the key companies that went public in 2013, their business models, performance post-IPO, and an FAQ section addressing common inquiries about IPOs.

Key Companies That Went Public in 2013

1. Twitter, Inc. (TWTR)

Industry: Social Media

IPO Date: November 7, 2013

IPO Price: $26.00

Market Cap at IPO: Approximately $18.1 billion

Twitter’s IPO was one of the most anticipated events of 2013. The company offered 70 million shares and saw its stock price surge by 73% on its first day of trading, closing at $44.90. Despite initial excitement, Twitter has faced challenges in user growth and monetization strategies, which have influenced its stock performance over the years.

2. Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA)

Industry: E-Commerce

IPO Date: September 19, 2013 (U.S. listing)

IPO Price: $68.00

Market Cap at IPO: Approximately $168 billion

Though Alibaba’s IPO occurred in 2014, it began trading on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) after filing in 2013. The company raised a record $25 billion, becoming the largest IPO in history at that time. Alibaba has continued to dominate the e-commerce sector, expanding its reach and diversifying its business into cloud computing and digital payments.

3. Royalty Pharma (RPRX)

Industry: Pharmaceuticals

IPO Date: January 24, 2013

IPO Price: $20.00

Market Cap at IPO: Approximately $5.8 billion

Royalty Pharma focuses on acquiring royalties from marketed pharmaceuticals. The company experienced steady growth post-IPO and has successfully expanded its portfolio through acquisitions, positioning itself as a significant player in the biopharmaceutical industry.

4. Shake Shack, Inc. (SHAK)

Industry: Fast Casual Dining

IPO Date: January 30, 2015 (initially planned for 2013)

IPO Price: $21.00

Market Cap at IPO: Approximately $1.6 billion

Although Shake Shack ultimately went public in 2015, its initial plans were set for 2013. The burger chain attracted a cult following, and its IPO generated considerable buzz, eventually seeing its stock price double on the first day of trading. Shake Shack has continued to expand its brand and presence in the fast-casual dining segment.

5. Fitbit, Inc. (FIT)

Industry: Wearable Technology

IPO Date: June 18, 2015 (initially filed in 2013)

IPO Price: $20.00

Market Cap at IPO: Approximately $4.1 billion

Fitbit, known for its fitness tracking devices, initially planned to go public in 2013 but faced delays. When it finally debuted, the stock saw a positive reception, reflecting growing consumer interest in health and fitness technology. However, Fitbit has since struggled with competition and evolving market trends.

6. Keurig Green Mountain, Inc. (GMCR)

Industry: Beverages

IPO Date: 1993 (secondary offerings in 2013)

IPO Price: Varied in secondary offerings

Keurig Green Mountain is best known for its single-serve coffee brewing systems. While the company went public earlier, it conducted significant secondary offerings in 2013 to raise capital for expansion and acquisitions, further solidifying its presence in the beverage industry.

Performance Analysis

The performance of these companies post-IPO varied widely. For instance, Twitter experienced significant volatility and has seen its share price fluctuate dramatically, reflecting challenges in user engagement and profitability. In contrast, Alibaba has steadily grown, benefiting from its dominant position in e-commerce and cloud computing.

Overall, 2013 set the stage for companies to leverage public funding for expansion and innovation. While some IPOs led to immediate success, others faced obstacles that impacted their long-term trajectories.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

What is an IPO?

An Initial Public Offering (IPO) is the process by which a private company offers its shares to the public for the first time. This allows the company to raise capital from public investors to fund growth and expansion.

Why do companies go public?

Companies go public for various reasons, including raising capital for expansion, increasing their visibility and credibility, providing liquidity for existing shareholders, and enabling employee stock ownership plans.

How is the IPO price determined?

The IPO price is typically determined through a combination of company valuation, investor demand, and market conditions. Underwriters play a crucial role in this process, assessing interest from institutional investors and setting an appropriate price.

What are the risks associated with investing in IPOs?

Investing in IPOs can be risky due to factors like lack of historical performance data, potential overvaluation, and market volatility. It’s essential for investors to conduct thorough research and consider their risk tolerance before investing.

How can I invest in an IPO?

Investors can participate in an IPO by placing orders through their brokerage accounts. However, access to IPO shares may be limited, especially for popular offerings, as brokers often prioritize institutional investors.

Conclusion

The IPO landscape of 2013 featured several notable companies that captured the attention of investors and the public. From tech giants like Twitter to established firms like Keurig, the year marked a significant moment in the market. Understanding the performance and dynamics of these companies provides valuable insights for prospective investors looking to navigate the IPO market in the future.

As always, thorough research and a clear investment strategy are essential for anyone considering investing in IPOs or the stock market at large.

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Cohen

Economic

Algorithms helped foreign funds and proprietary trading desks pocket 588.4 billion rupees (RM29.36 billion) in gross profits from trading Indian equity derivatives, a study by the nation’s market regulator showed.

The bulk of the gains came at the expense of individual traders and others, who lost a combined 610 billion rupees dabbling in futures and options in the financial year ended March, according to the study published Monday.

The findings align with the Securities & Exchange Board of India’s efforts to slow the rapid growth of the equity derivatives segment, where the turnover hit US$6 trillion (RM25.04 trillion) in early February — greater than the entire output of the nation’s economy. The regulator has repeatedly warned small investors that they are taking a big risk in trying to bet against better-funded and more experienced financial market players.

“There is little scope for individual traders to beat a mathematically-written model,” said Karthick Jonagadla, CEO of Mumbai-based Quantace Research and Capital Pvt. “Trading equity options is altogether a different beast and chances of having a reward-to-risk ratio in your favour are minuscule.”

India’s derivatives market grabbed global attention in April after US-based Jane Street Group revealed that a strategy used in the country generated US$1 billion in profits. The revelation also shed light on how smaller investors are often at the wrong end of the trade.

Nine out of every 10 retail derivatives traders lost money during the three-year period ended March, with the average loss per trader at about 200,000 rupees, SEBI’s latest study showed. Only 1% of traders made profits of over 100,000 rupees. More than 75% of the 10 million individual traders in India declared annual income of less than 500,000 rupees.

Source: Theedgemarkets

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Alex

Economic

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) said it is looking forward to working with Sri Lanka’s newly elected leftist president, including on the latest review of the country’s US$3 billion (RM12.59 billion) bailout package.

“We will discuss the timing of the third review of the IMF-supported programme with the new administration as soon as practicable,” the organisation said in a statement after President Anura Kumara Dissanayake was sworn into office on Monday.

“We look forward to working together with President Dissanayake and his team towards building on the hard-won gains that have helped put Sri Lanka on a path to economic recovery since entering one of its worst economic crises in 2022,” the IMF added.

Dissanayake had campaigned on a promise to reopen negotiations with the IMF on the country’s big loan programme. It came with deeply unpopular tax hikes and spending cuts that made the cost-of-living crisis a top issue for voters.

Reviewing the debt plan, though, risks delaying additional loans from the international organisation. Sri Lanka needs to meet certain fiscal criteria before the next round of funding is released.

The country’s former president, Ranil Wickremesinghe, brokered the deal with the IMF, and said upending it would be a costly mistake for the economy. Prior to the cash injection, the country faced an unprecedented economic crisis where spiralling inflation wiped out household savings and ignited protests.

Investors hope that Dissanayake will stick with the loan plan. Rizvie Salih, an executive committee member of the president’s coalition party, said on Saturday that the country will remain with the programme but seek modifications.

In its statement, the IMF said the recent agreement with bondholders “represents significant progress in Sri Lanka’s debt restructuring process”, adding that it’s still “subject to confirmation on comparability of treatment by Sri Lanka’s Official Creditors Committee”.

Source: Theedgemarkets

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Warren Takunda

Cryptocurrency

Bitcoin looks ready to undergo a substantial breakout toward $78,000 in the coming weeks, primarily due to price chart technicals and China’s latest economic stimulus.

Central bank liquidity will boost Bitcoin demand: Analyst

On Sept. 24, the People’s Bank of China (PBOC) announced that it would inject around $140 billion of liquidity into the financial system by cutting the reserve requirement ratio (RRR) by 50 basis points.

The PBOC has lowered borrowing costs and eased property purchase rules to shore up its struggling real estate market and the wider economy.

Jamie Coutts, chief crypto analyst at investment management firm Real Vision, argues that China’s latest stimulus package is bullish for Bitcoin, pointing out that it would influence other central banks to follow suit.

“The bottom is in for global central bank liquidity for this cycle. Sit back and watch the other CBs fall into line,” he noted, adding:

“In a credit-based fiat fractional reserve system, debasement is a feature, not a bug.” Bitcoin Price Target Rises to $78K After Chinese Stimulus Package_1

Bitcoin Price Target Rises to $78K After Chinese Stimulus Package_1

BTC/USD vs. Big Four central bank balance sheets. Source: Jamie Coutts

The PBOC’s recent stimulus package announcements have preceded huge rallies in risk assets like Bitcoin. For instance, the PBOC injected $367.7 billion through reverse repos in October 2023 and $140 billion by reducing the RRR by 50 basis points in January 2024

Bitcoin’s price rose by over 100% following the stimulus package announcements. Bitcoin Price Target Rises to $78K After Chinese Stimulus Package_2

Bitcoin Price Target Rises to $78K After Chinese Stimulus Package_2

BTC/USD daily price chart ft. Chinese stimulus packages. Source: TradingView

Interestingly, the direct connection between Chinese liquidity and Bitcoin is less obvious due to the 2021 crypto mining ban in China.

However, as Coutts pointed out, Bitcoin’s performance remains closely tied to global liquidity conditions, and China’s easing measures could prompt broader shifts in risk appetite.

Technical analysis: Bull flag breakout eyes $78K

Adding to the bullish outlook is the formation of a bull flag pattern on Bitcoin’s longer-timeframe chart.

A bull flag pattern develops when the price consolidates inside a descending channel range after a strong upside move. As a rule, the pattern resolves when the price breaks above the upper trendline and rises as much as the previous uptrend’s height.

As of Sept. 24, BTC’s price was testing its flag’s upper trendline for a potential breakout above $78,000—a new record high. Bitcoin Price Target Rises to $78K After Chinese Stimulus Package_3

Bitcoin Price Target Rises to $78K After Chinese Stimulus Package_3

BTC/USD daily price chart. Source: TradingView

Conversely, a pullback from the upper trendline will likely take the price down toward the lower trendline, aligning with the 0.0 Fibonacci retracement trendline of around $5.

As Cointelegraph reported, BTC may need to rise well above $80,000 to achieve a new all-time high value when adjusted for inflation.

Source: Cointelegraph

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

JPMorgan

Economic

On Thursday, the Bureau of Economic Analysis, commonly known as the BEA, will release revised data on the national income and product accounts going back to the start of 2019. This is an annual process, usually only mildly interesting to economists and ignored by everyone else. However, this year it’s more important since it could help clarify the trajectory of the economy at a critical time for both political and monetary policy choices. It’s also important because it could help resolve at least some of a yawning discrepancy between the estimates of output produced and income received in the American economy.

In theory, of course, there should be no such discrepancy. The total value of goods and services produced in the United States should be precisely equal to the total value of the income received by the producers of that output. In practice, however, government estimates of these totals have never been exactly equal and in the second quarter, the so-called “statistical discrepancy”, (that is the gap between net national product and national income), had widened out to a record $769.9 billion, or 2.7% of GDP. In other words, our measured income was 2.7% lower than our measured output.

This begs a number of questions. First, what’s causing this discrepancy? Second, will Thursday’s revisions either reduce or eliminate it? and third, regardless of whether it gets fixed or not, what does any adjustment to the discrepancy imply about the health of the consumer and business sectors, and the potential path going forward for both economic growth and inflation?

Reasons for the Error

The broad explanation offered by the BEA for the existence of a significant statistical discrepancy is that the output and income accounts use different data sources with different timing and different seasonal adjustment. However, other explanations include misreporting or evasion of taxes, inconsistent approaches to measuring depreciation, and measures of capital gains and losses leaking into measures of profits and income where they don’t properly belong.1

These, of course, are not new problems and, in an ideal world, the BEA would be leading a drive to achieve greater consistency in data collection, accounting and seasonal adjustment techniques to try to nearly eliminate the statistical discrepancy. However, perhaps because of budget constraints, the annual revisions merely chip away at the problem. As evidence of this, over the past decade, annual revisions have reduced the statistical discrepancy by only 20% for the most recent GDP quarter.

Consequently, this Thursday’s data may only provide partial enlightenment on some key economic issues. That being said, recent history does suggest two things about the likely nature of this year’s revision.

First, to the extent that the gap between output and income is closed by revisions, most of the change will likely occur on the income side of the ledger. Over the last decade, the absolute size of the percentage revisions to output have been only half as large as the revisions to income.

Second, in revising income, while the BEA may boost measured worker compensation, they are more likely to increase profits or proprietors’ income. Historically, those categories have seen much larger revisions than compensation.

What the Revisions could Reveal

So what might we learn about the economy this week?

First, current data show that, despite the pandemic, real GDP grew at an above trend 2.2% over the past five years – will revisions trim those numbers down to 2.0% or below?

Second, will revised data show stronger gains in personal income or corporate profits or both over the past five years?

The personal saving rate stood at 3.3% in the second quarter compared to 7.4% on average in 2019. If personal income is revised up, it should boost the personal saving rate, leaving consumers looking less tapped out heading into the end of the year.

Second quarter adjusted after-tax profits for all corporations, according to the BEA, were up 29% from five years earlier. However, S&P500 pro-forma and operating earnings per share were up 45% and 46% respectively over the same period. If revisions show that the government numbers underestimated profit growth, they could also suggest that corporations have the resources to continue hiring and investing into 2025.

Any revisions to inventory growth could also be important in determining the pace of stock-piling or inventory reduction as 2024 draws to an end.

Finally, economists will be watching revisions to inflation, as measured by the personal consumption deflator. Revised data could widen or narrow the gap between CPI inflation and its cooler consumption deflator counterpart. This will either increase or diminish the probability that year-over-year consumption deflator inflation could fall to 2.0% in September, validating the Fed’s aggressive monetary easing move of last week and increasing the likelihood of a speedier “normalization” in interest rates going forward.

Investment Implications

Markets are supposed to be forward looking so some might question the relevance of revisions going all the way back to 2019. However, the truth is there remains great uncertainty about the path the economy is on. So far, current data continue to point to a soft-landing expansion. However, with futures markets anticipating faster Fed easing than the Fed itself is indicating and the S&P500 trading at a lofty 21.4 times forward earnings, it appears that financial markets have more than fully discounted this benign outcome. In this environment, it makes sense to be well diversified and pay special attention to any information, including revised national income and product account numbers, that might suggest any straying from this still narrow path.

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Warren Takunda

Stocks

December S&P 500 E-Mini futures are up +0.21%, and December Nasdaq 100 E-Mini futures are up +0.30% this morning as global risk sentiment got a boost after Beijing announced one of its most aggressive economic stimulus packages since the pandemic.

In yesterday’s trading session, Wall Street’s major indexes closed in the green. Tesla climbed nearly +5% and was the top percentage gainer on the S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100 after Barclays said it expects the company’s Q3 deliveries to exceed consensus estimates, which could drive continued stock strength. Also, Intel advanced more than +3% and was the top percentage gainer on the Dow after Bloomberg reported that Apollo Global Management had offered to make a multibillion-dollar investment in the chipmaker. In addition, Walmart gained over +1% after Melius Research LLC initiated coverage of the stock with a Buy rating and a price target of $95. On the bearish side, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals slid more than -4% and was the top percentage loser on the S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100 after a federal judge in West Virginia rejected the company’s motion for a temporary injunction against Amgen, which recently received FDA approval for the biosimilar eye drug Pavblu.

Economic data released on Monday showed that the U.S. S&P Global manufacturing PMI unexpectedly fell to 47.0 in September, weaker than expectations of 48.6 and the steepest pace of contraction in 15 months. Also, the U.S. September S&P Global services PMI fell to 55.4, better than expectations of 55.3.

“This is a somewhat inconclusive report, and therefore it shouldn’t alter Fed expectations dramatically,” said Adam Crisafulli at Vital Knowledge. “The flash PMIs do suggest the U.S. economy is on reasonably sound footing, especially compared to Europe.”

Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee stated on Monday that interest rates need to be reduced “significantly” to protect the U.S. labor market and bolster the economy. “As we’ve gained confidence that we are on the path back to 2%, it’s appropriate to increase our focus on the other side of the Fed’s mandate - to think about risks to employment,” Goolsbee said. “That likely means many more rate cuts over the next year.” Also, Minneapolis Fed President Neel Kashkari said that he anticipates lowering interest rates by smaller, quarter-point moves at each of the central bank’s two remaining meetings this year. “As we go forward, I expect, on balance, we will probably take smaller steps unless the data changes materially,” Kashkari said.

Meanwhile, U.S. rate futures have priced in a 49.1% probability of a 25 basis point rate cut and a 50.9% chance of a 50 basis point rate cut at the November FOMC meeting.

Today, all eyes are focused on the U.S. Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index, set to be released in a couple of hours. Economists, on average, forecast that the September CB Consumer Confidence index will stand at 103.9, compared to last month’s figure of 103.3.

Also, investors will focus on the U.S. S&P/CS HPI Composite - 20 n.s.a., which arrived at +6.5% y/y in June. Economists foresee the July figure to be +5.9% y/y.

The U.S. Richmond Manufacturing Index will be reported today as well. Economists estimate this figure to come in at -13 in September, compared to the previous value of -19.

In addition, market participants will be anticipating a speech from Fed Governor Michelle Bowman.

In the bond market, the yield on the benchmark 10-year U.S. Treasury note is at 3.791%, up +1.38%.

The Euro Stoxx 50 futures are up +1.28% this morning, tracking a rally in Asia after the People’s Bank of China unveiled a raft of stimulus measures to boost the Chinese economy. China is a key export market for many of Europe’s leading companies, which have faced challenges due to a decline in demand as Chinese consumers have reduced their spending. Mining, luxury, and automobile stocks outperformed on Tuesday. Investors also dismissed disappointing PMI data from the Eurozone, Germany, and France released on Monday and instead concentrated on the potential for further rate cuts from the economic bloc. Meanwhile, a survey released on Tuesday showed that German business sentiment fell more than anticipated in September. In corporate news, Smiths Group Plc slumped over -7% after the U.K. engineering firm reported weaker-than-expected annual profit.

Germany’s Ifo Business Climate Index, Germany’s Business Expectations, and Germany’s Current Assessment data were released today.

The German September Ifo Business Climate Index has been reported at 85.4, weaker than expectations of 86.1.

The German September Business Expectations stood at 86.3, in line with expectations.

The German September Current Assessment came in at 84.4, weaker than expectations of 86.1.

Asian stock markets today settled in the green. China’s Shanghai Composite Index (SHCOMP) closed up +4.15%, and Japan’s Nikkei 225 Stock Index (NIK) closed up +0.57%.

China’s Shanghai Composite Index closed sharply higher today, notching its biggest daily gain since July 2020, after the nation’s central bank unveiled stimulus measures aimed at achieving this year’s economic growth target and curbing a selloff in the equity market. Consumer products and brokerage stocks led the gains on Tuesday. In a rare briefing on Tuesday, People’s Bank of China Governor Pan Gongsheng announced that the PBOC will reduce the reserve requirement ratio, the amount of cash that banks are required to hold as reserves, by 50 basis points. Also, the seven-day reverse repurchase rate, China’s main policy rate, will be lowered to 1.5% from 1.7%, a move that Pan said would reduce borrowing costs of the PBOC’s medium-term lending facility by 30 basis points. In addition, China will cut rates on existing mortgage loans, and Pan anticipates that mortgage rates will, on average, decrease by about 50 basis points. The minimum downpayment for second homes will be lowered to 15% from 25%. Meanwhile, Pan stated that more easing is forthcoming, with another reduction in bank reserve requirements anticipated before the end of the year. The central bank also announced that it would provide 500 billion yuan (around $70 billion) in loans to funds, brokers, and insurers for purchasing Chinese stocks, as part of an initiative to support the country’s struggling stock market. It announced plans to allocate an additional 300 billion yuan to fund share buybacks by listed companies. Analysts, however, warn that the rally might soon lose steam as some of the fundamental problems plaguing China’s economy, such as deflationary pressures, remain unsolved. In corporate news, Yonghui Superstores surged about +10% after Miniso announced plans to purchase a nearly 30% stake in the Chinese supermarket operator.

Meanwhile, the Reserve Bank of Australia maintained its cash rate target at 4.35% for a seventh consecutive meeting and reiterated that it is not “ruling anything in or out” regarding policy.

Japan’s Nikkei 225 Stock Index closed higher today as trading resumed after a long weekend, with Wall Street’s overnight gains and dovish remarks from Bank of Japan Governor Kazuo Ueda boosting investor sentiment. Consumer and healthcare stocks led the gains on Tuesday. A survey released on Tuesday showed that while manufacturing activity in Japan continued to contract in September, overall business momentum was driven by a growing service sector. Meanwhile, BOJ Governor Kazuo Ueda stated on Tuesday that the central bank could take its time analyzing market and global economic developments when setting monetary policy, indicating that it was in no hurry to raise interest rates further. Ueda reaffirmed that the BOJ will increase interest rates if trend inflation progresses toward its 2% target as anticipated. Investor attention is now directed toward the release of the minutes from the BOJ policy meeting scheduled for Thursday, which could provide insights into potential policy normalization. The Nikkei Volatility, which takes into account the implied volatility of Nikkei 225 options, closed up +9.41% to 26.62.

The Japanese September au Jibun Bank Japan Manufacturing PMI (preliminary) arrived at 49.6, weaker than expectations of 49.9.

Pre-Market U.S. Stock Movers

Visa fell over -1% in pre-market trading after Bloomberg reported that the U.S. Justice Department plans to file a lawsuit alleging the company illegally monopolized the U.S. debit card market.

Uber Technologies gained more than +1% in pre-market trading after Raymond James resumed coverage of the stock with a Strong Buy rating and a $90 price target.

Hawaiian Electric Industries plunged over -11% in pre-market trading after pricing its previously announced public offering of approximately 54 million shares at $9.25 per share.

Source: BarChart

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Daily News

Remarks of Officials

Central Bank

Forex

FastBull Events

FastBull Featured

Devin

Mohammad Omar

Recent Searches

Top Searches

Markets

News

Analysis

User

24/7

Economic Calendar

Education

Data

Exploring Ethereum with FintechZoom: The Driving Force Behind Decentralized Finance

The Basics of Ethereum

Market Performance and Trends

Decentralized Finance (DeFi) and Ethereum

Future Outlook

Conclusion

Key Companies That Had Their Ipo in 2013

Key Companies That Went Public in 2013

1. Twitter, Inc. (TWTR)

2. Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA)

3. Royalty Pharma (RPRX)

4. Shake Shack, Inc. (SHAK)

5. Fitbit, Inc. (FIT)

6. Keurig Green Mountain, Inc. (GMCR)

Performance Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

What is an IPO?

Why do companies go public?

How is the IPO price determined?

What are the risks associated with investing in IPOs?

How can I invest in an IPO?

Conclusion

High-speed Traders Made US$7 Bil In India’s Options Market

Source: Theedgemarkets

IMF to Work With New Leftist Sri Lanka Leader on US$3b Loan

Source: Theedgemarkets

Bitcoin Price Target Rises to $78K After Chinese Stimulus Package

Central bank liquidity will boost Bitcoin demand: Analyst

BTC/USD vs. Big Four central bank balance sheets. Source: Jamie Coutts

BTC/USD daily price chart ft. Chinese stimulus packages. Source: TradingView

Technical analysis: Bull flag breakout eyes $78K

BTC/USD daily price chart. Source: TradingView

Source: Cointelegraph

The Investment Implications of a $769,900,000,000 Mistake

Reasons for the Error

What the Revisions could Reveal

Investment Implications

Stock Index Futures Climb as China Stimulus Buoys Global Risk Appetite

Source: BarChart

Risk Disclosure